• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Advertising
  • Write for Us
  • Job Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
    • Consulting
    • Advertising
  • Shop
    • Books
    • Shirts

The Educators Room logo

  • Start Here
    • Impact Statements: Teacher Expertise
    • Newsletter
  • Browse Topics
    • Content Strategies
      • Literacy
      • Mathematics
      • Social Studies
      • Educational Technology
      • ELL & ESOL
      • Fine Arts
      • Special Education
      • Popular Topics
        • Teacher Self-Care
        • Instructional Coach Files
        • Common Core
        • The Traveling Teacher
        • The Unemployed Teacher
        • The New Teacher Chronicles
        • Book Review
        • Grade Levels
          • Elementary (K-5)
          • Middle (6-8)
          • Adult
          • New Teacher Bootcamp
          • Hot Button Topics
            • Menu Item
              • Principals' Corner
              • Charter Schools
              • Confessions of a Teacher
              • Interviews
              • The State of Education
              • Stellar Educator of the Week
            • Menu
              • How to Fix Education
              • Featured
              • Ask a Teacher
              • Teacher Branding
              • Current Events
  • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Practicing Self-Care to Avoid Teacher Burnout- An 8 Week Course
    • Becoming An Educational Consultant
    • Teacher Branding 101:Teachers are The Experts
    • The Learning Academy
    • Books
    • Shirts
  • Education in Atlanta
  • Teacher Self-Care
  • The Coach's Academy
menu icon
go to homepage
subscribe
search icon
Homepage link
  • Advertising
  • Write for Us
  • Job Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
    • Consulting
    • Advertising
  • Shop
    • Books
    • Shirts
×

June 26, 2013 Featured

Supreme Court Rules on Affirmative Action Case

  • About the Author
  • Latest Posts

About Yoshana Jones

Yoshana B. Jones, Esq. is an educator and Professional Learning Facilitator with Fulton County Schools. She leads the professional development of educators lead PLCs at Westlake High School. For the 2013-2014 school year, Coordinate Algebra students experienced at 11% gain on the state standardized test. Ms. Jones is committed to educational equity for all students. She is the Chair of the new PLC Development team, which is dedicated to providing opportunities for teachers to learn and grow as professionals. In addition to her work with students, Ms. Jones is the Owner of Good Samaritan Apparel, LLC. Good Samaritan Apparel is a Christian t-shirt company that hopes to spread love, joy, and the Word. Ms. Jones writes inspirational blog posts that encourages Christian believers to remain full of faith.
  • Michigan Student Prevails in First Amendment Claim against Teacher - July 17, 2013
  • Michigan High School Bans Athletic Prayer - July 9, 2013
  • Surviving Teach for America: What I Learned from the Corps - July 2, 2013
  • Supreme Court Rules on Affirmative Action Case - June 26, 2013
  • The First Amendment and Student Dress Codes - April 15, 2013
  • Testing Pressure Leads to a Criminal Indictment - April 1, 2013
  • Planning for the Future: Special Needs Students' Transition Plan - February 20, 2013
  • Protecting the Protectors: Limited Liability from Students’ Lawsuits - February 14, 2013
  • Teacher Tenure- An Ancient Policy Or Is It Still Needed? - January 8, 2013
  • Are More Gun Control Laws Needed? - December 31, 2012

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="yes" overflow="visible"][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type="1_1" background_position="left top" background_color="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" spacing="yes" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" padding="" margin_top="0px" margin_bottom="0px" class="" id="" animation_type="" animation_speed="0.3" animation_direction="left" hide_on_mobile="no" center_content="no" min_height="none"]

courtesty SCOTUS

courtesty SCOTUS

On Monday, June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas, the higher education affirmative action case.  I previously wrote about affirmative action and the backstory of the Fisher case in another TER article.  The case was brought by Abigail Fisher, a white applicant who was denied admissions under the university's race-conscious admissions policy.  The University of Texas has a two-fold admissions policy.  Any student who graduated in the top ten percent of a Texas high school automatically gains admission to the university.  All other applicants are considered in a separate admissions pool, where factors such as test scores, geographic connections, community service, leadership potential, and race are considered.

The Fisher decision cannot be seen as a full victory for either opponents or proponents of affirmative action.  The Court's decision is very narrow; it remanded (or sent back) the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to decide whether the University of Texas's admissions policy will meet the strict scrutiny standard.

Strict scrutiny is the toughest judicial standard recognized by U.S. courts; thus, it is a very difficult standard for the government to meet.  Strict scrutiny is applied when fundamental rights are abridged or a law involves a suspect classification, such as race, national origin, religion, or poverty.

In order to survive strict scrutiny, the burden is on the government to show that the law is narrowly tailored to meet a compelling government interest.  The Court ruled that the Fifth Circuit should have required the University of Texas to show that its admissions policy is narrowly tailored to achieve its goal of campus diversity.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion for the Court.  "Narrow tailoring also requires a reviewing court to verify that it is 'necessary' for the university to use race to achieve the educational benefits of diversity," reasoned Justice Kennedy.  In other words, the court hearing the affirmative action matter cannot simply take the university's word that race is needed to achieve diversity; the burden is on the university to prove it.

Justice Kennedy also wrote that alternatives to affirmative action must be considered.  "The reviewing court must ultimately be satisfied that no workable race-neutral alternatives would produce the educational benefits of diversity."  Based on Justice Kennedy's reasoning, if there are feasible alternatives that will produce the same educational effect, then there will be no need to use race in deciding admission to a university.

Justice Clarence Thomas also questioned the need for race in admissions decisions.  But, his stance was much stronger than Justice Kennedy's.  Justice Thomas explained that the use of race in admissions decisions violates the Constitution.  "[/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type="1_1" background_position="left top" background_color="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" spacing="yes" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" padding="" margin_top="0px" margin_bottom="0px" class="" id="" animation_type="" animation_speed="0.3" animation_direction="left" hide_on_mobile="no" center_content="no" min_height="none"][A] State’s use of race in higher education admissions decisions is categorically prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause."  Justice Thomas's explanation questions the continuing utility of affirmative actions programs in today's society.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the sole dissenter in the 7-1 Fisher decision.  She reasoned that the case should not be remanded to the Fifth Circuit because "the University reached the reasonable, good-faith judgment that supposedly race-neutral initiatives were insufficient to achieve, in appropriate measure, the educational benefits of student body diversity."  Essentially, according to Justice Ginsburg's reasoning, any race-neutral alternatives would have been insufficient to achieve the university's compelling interest in student diversity.

It will be months before the Fifth Circuit issues its ruling in this case.  But, based on the Court's language in Fisher, affirmative action programs will soon be experiencing a drastic change.

 [/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailA Blind Eye to Color: The Future of Affirmative Action in U.S. Colleges and Universities Friedrichs v. CTA - Supreme Court Hears a Major Education Case Affirmative Action at the Crossroads: Which Direction will the Supreme Court Go? Special EducationStaying Within Law: Special Education Teachers and IDEA
« Dealing with Difficult Parents
Dear Common Core: Science Supports Reading Fiction »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

The Educator's Room was launched in 2012 to amplify the voice of educators. To date, we have over 45+ writers from around the world and boast over twelve million page views. Through articles, events, and social media we will advocate for honest dialogue with teachers about how to improve public education. This mission is especially important when reporting on education in our community; therefore, we commit our readers to integrity, accuracy, and independence in education reporting. To join our mailing list, click here.

What we do

At The Educator's Room, we focus on amplifying and honoring the voice of educators as experts in education. To date, we have over 40 staff writers/teachers from around the world.

Popular Posts

  • My Union Showed Up for Me, and I'll Never Forget It
  • Your Students Deserve a Diverse Classroom Library. Here's How to Set It Up.
  • You Don't Have to Watch the Tyre Nichols Video, But Be Ready to Talk About It
  • "Let's Make This Happen": Following Student Interests to Interest-Based Mentorships

Featured On

Buy Our Books/Courses

How to Leave Your Job in Education

Practicing Self-Care to Avoid Teacher Burnout

Using Your Teacher Expertise to Become an Educational Consultant

Check out our books on teaching and learning!

The Learning Academy

Footer

↑ back to top

About

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Accessibility Policy

Newsletter

  • Sign Up! for emails and updates

Contact

  • Contact
  • Services
  • Media Kit
  • FAQ

 

Copyright © 2021 The Educator's Room.